Proxmox alternative — when SMB-grade virtualization stops being enough

Open-source Cozystack (CNCF project, created by Ænix) → Ænix Public Cloud, Private Cloud and AI Platform → Ænix builds, operates and migrates them.

A Proxmox alternative is a virtualization platform that takes over where Proxmox VE’s small-to-mid-size design center stops scaling — typically when teams need hard multi-tenancy, a managed-service catalog beyond VMs, service-provider billing, or GPU and AI workloads. Cozystack is the open-source, Kubernetes-native alternative built for that next stage: it runs VMs through KubeVirt and containers on a single Kubernetes API, with Cilium (eBPF) networking, LINSTOR/DRBD storage, a Tenant CRD multi-tenancy model, and first-class managed databases and S3 object storage on the same hardware Proxmox runs on. Ænix, which created Cozystack and co-maintains it, sells Ænix Public Cloud Platform, support, and architecture and migration services for hosting providers, regional clouds, and regulated enterprises outgrowing Proxmox.

Quick facts

  • What it is A Kubernetes-native, multi-tenant open-source platform for organizations that have outgrown Proxmox VE’s single-tenant, VM-focused design center.
  • Licence Apache 2.0 (no per-CPU / per-core licensing); Proxmox VE is AGPLv3.
  • Status Cozystack is a CNCF project (Sandbox since 2025-02-28; Incubating application in due diligence).
  • Best fit Hosting providers, regional clouds, and regulated enterprises needing multi-tenancy, managed databases, S3, and GPU as a service.
  • Key capability VMs (KubeVirt) and containers on one Kubernetes API, with Tenant CRD isolation, Cilium (eBPF) networking, and LINSTOR/DRBD storage.
  • Migration Proxmox qcow2 VM images import directly into KubeVirt storage; typical engagement is a 14- or 28-day Platform Readiness Assessment plus 3-9 months implementation.
  • Commercial offering Support tiers for Ænix Public Cloud Platform and self-run Cozystack from $1,250 per 10 nodes per month (Basic) through Standard $3,000, Plus $5,500 and Enterprise custom.

Proxmox VE is excellent for what it is: an open-source KVM-based virtualization platform optimized for small-to-mid-size deployments. The architectural moment many teams reach is when production grows past Proxmox’s design center — multi-tenancy at scale, managed databases, AI/GPU workloads, regulated multi-customer cloud — and the operational cost of running Proxmox at that scale exceeds the licensing savings.

Cozystack is the open-source platform built for that next stage. Kubernetes-native virtualization (KubeVirt), multi-tenant control plane, managed database services, S3 object storage, GPU as a service — on the same hardware Proxmox runs on, with a different operational model.

Pairs with: Ænix Public Cloud Platform — a complete public-cloud product for hosting providers and regional clouds outgrowing Proxmox: customer portal, billing and service catalog. WHMCS billing integration (a proprietary Ænix module), multi-tenant by design, productized installer. Support tiers from $1,250 per 10 nodes per month.


When Proxmox stops being the right answer

  • Multi-tenancy is required — Proxmox resource pools and ACLs delegate well inside one organisation; they are not built for untrusted customers under regulatory audit.
  • Service catalog beyond VMs — managed databases, S3, K8s tenancy, GPU workloads. Proxmox is VM-focused; integrating these on top is doable but operationally heavy.
  • Service-provider scale — multi-customer cloud with billing integration, self-service portal, audit per tenant.
  • Production multi-cluster federation — Proxmox clusters federate; the operational model is heavier than Kubernetes.

Where Proxmox VE is genuinely better

Simplicity is a feature, and none of the tables above price it:

  • One ISO, one afternoon. A working cluster with HA and a web UI, stood up by one person. Cozystack asks the team to understand Kubernetes before it understands the platform, and that is a real cost.
  • Proxmox Backup Server. Incremental, deduplicated, verified backups with single-file restore, from the same vendor, in the same UI. Velero plus per-application PITR covers the same ground with more moving parts and more design.
  • ZFS and Ceph built in. First-class, installable from the UI, vendor-supported. No storage architecture decision on day one.
  • Subscription cost. Proxmox subscriptions are priced per CPU socket per year: the Community tier sits in low three figures, and the tiers with support tickets cost more, but all of them are a different order of magnitude from any platform engagement, ours included.
  • LXC. A container that behaves like a machine is genuinely useful and Kubernetes does not offer it.

If your deployment is single-tenant, VM-mostly, and run by a small team, Proxmox is the right answer and migrating costs more than it returns. Cozystack is the upgrade path once hard multi-tenancy, a catalogue beyond VMs, or per-tenant billing enter the requirements.


What Cozystack adds vs Proxmox VE

CapabilityProxmox VECozystack
ComputeKVM/LXCKubeVirt (KVM) + Kubernetes containers
StorageZFS, Ceph (community), shared storageLINSTOR (DRBD) or SeaweedFS
NetworkLinux bridge, SDNCilium (eBPF)
Multi-tenancyResource pools + role-based ACLs + auth realmsTenant CRD, nested tenants, scoped audit
Managed databasesManual install or community LXC templatesFirst-class: PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Valkey, Kafka, ClickHouse, RabbitMQ
Object storageManual installFirst-class S3-compatible
GPUPassthroughPassthrough or NVIDIA vGPU for VMs; GPU Operator + HAMi sharing for pods
Self-service portalWeb UI for VM opsCozystack Dashboard — full multi-tenant catalog
Backup/DRPBS (Proxmox Backup Server)Velero + per-app PITR
LicenceAGPLv3 (open source)Apache 2.0 (open source, more permissive)
Best forSMB virtualization, labsMulti-tenant cloud, service providers, regulated enterprise

Cozystack is not “Proxmox but better” — it’s a different architectural target. For SMB-scale single-tenant virtualization, Proxmox remains a strong choice.


Migration path from Proxmox to Cozystack

VM image migration is straightforward — Proxmox’s qcow2 images import directly into KubeVirt’s storage. Multi-tenant model is designed rather than converted — pools and ACLs do not map onto tenants. Networking and storage layers re-architect.

Typical migration: a 14- or 28-day Platform Readiness Assessment, then 3-9 months implementation depending on scope. Details: Proxmox migration hub.

Proxmox VE
VM-focusedPools + ACLsAGPLv3
migrates via
Migration path
qcow2 → KubeVirt14- or 28-day assessment3-9 months implementation
lands on
Cozystack
KubeVirt VMsTenant CRDCilium eBPF
unlocks
Multi-tenant cloud
Managed databasesS3GPU as a service

How to start

If you’re evaluating where Proxmox stops being right for your use case, start with a free architecture call.


Ænix created Cozystack (CNCF Sandbox project, CNCF Certified Kubernetes distribution) and co-maintains it. On top of it we offer Ænix Public Cloud Platform, Ænix Private Cloud Platform and Ænix AI Platform.

Frequently asked questions

When should I move from Proxmox to Cozystack?

When production grows past Proxmox VE’s design center — hard multi-tenancy under audit, a service catalog beyond VMs (managed databases, S3, GPU), service-provider scale with per-tenant billing, or heavier-than-Kubernetes multi-cluster federation. For single-tenant, VM-mostly deployments under roughly 50 hosts, Proxmox usually remains a strong choice.

Can I migrate Proxmox VMs to Cozystack?

Yes. Proxmox qcow2 images import directly into KubeVirt’s storage, so VM migration is straightforward. The multi-tenant model is designed rather than converted, because pools and ACLs do not map onto tenants, and the networking and storage layers are re-architected. A typical engagement runs a 14- or 28-day Platform Readiness Assessment plus 3-9 months implementation depending on scope.

How does Cozystack licensing compare to Proxmox?

Both are open source, but the licences differ. Proxmox VE is AGPLv3; Cozystack is Apache 2.0, a more permissive licence with no per-CPU or per-core fees. Ænix charges for platform subscriptions, support and services, not for the open-source core.

Does Cozystack support multi-tenancy the way Proxmox does not?

Yes. Cozystack uses a Tenant CRD with nested tenants and per-tenant scoped audit, giving isolation suitable for multi-customer cloud under regulatory audit. Proxmox uses resource pools with role-based ACLs and pluggable auth realms, which delegates well inside one organisation but is not designed for untrusted multi-customer environments.

What does Cozystack add beyond running virtual machines?

Beyond KubeVirt VMs and Kubernetes containers, Cozystack provides first-class managed databases (PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Valkey, Kafka, ClickHouse, RabbitMQ), S3-compatible object storage, GPU as a service (passthrough or NVIDIA vGPU for VMs with your NVIDIA vGPU licence; for pods, MIG partitions through the NVIDIA GPU Operator and time-sliced sharing with HAMi), a multi-tenant self-service portal, and Velero-based backup with per-app point-in-time recovery.

Is Cozystack just a better Proxmox?

No. It targets a different architectural problem. For SMB-scale, single-tenant virtualization, Proxmox VE remains a strong, simpler choice. Cozystack is the upgrade path when you need a multi-tenant cloud, service-provider operations, or regulated-enterprise isolation while keeping an open-source operational model.

Planning your migration?

Start with a fixed-price Platform Readiness Assessment — architecture review, gap analysis, and a roadmap you can take to the board.